Explain why the standard electrode potential of the Cl₂/Cl⁻ half-cell is more positive than that of the I₂/I⁻ half-cell, and predict which species acts as the oxidising agent when a mixture of Cl₂ and I⁻ ions is present in aqueous solution.
Written & reviewed by James Millett — Biology (Imperial College London), PGCE Science (University of Cambridge).
The standard electrode potentials are: Cl₂(g) + 2e⁻ → 2Cl⁻(aq), E° = +1.36 V; I₂(aq) + 2e⁻ → 2I⁻(aq), E° = +0.54 V.
Model answer (4 marks)
Cl₂ has a greater tendency to be reduced than I₂, as shown by its more positive E° value. This is because Cl is more electronegative and has a greater nuclear attraction for electrons, so Cl₂ more readily accepts electrons to form Cl⁻.
Cl₂ acts as the oxidising agent (it is reduced to Cl⁻). I⁻ is oxidised to I₂ because the species with the less positive E° is reversed and acts as the reducing agent; the overall cell EMF is positive (1.36 − 0.54 = +0.82 V), confirming the reaction is spontaneous.
Cl₂ acts as the oxidising agent (it is reduced to Cl⁻). I⁻ is oxidised to I₂ because the species with the less positive E° is reversed and acts as the reducing agent; the overall cell EMF is positive (1.36 − 0.54 = +0.82 V), confirming the reaction is spontaneous.
Examiner tips
- Use the phrase ‘greater tendency to be reduced’ to link E° to oxidising ability.
- Explain the electronegativity reason briefly – it shows understanding of why E° differs.
- State the direction of the reaction clearly – Cl₂ is reduced, I⁻ is oxidised.
- Show the cell EMF calculation to prove spontaneity.
Common mistakes
- Confusing which species is oxidised/reduced – students often say I₂ is reduced.
- Failing to mention the electronegativity explanation or giving a vague reason for the E° difference.
- Not showing the EMF calculation or leaving the sign of the EMF unclear.
Mark scheme (4 marks)
- Cl₂ has a greater tendency to be reduced / gain electrons than I₂, as shown by its more positive E° value.
- This is because Cl has greater electronegativity / nuclear attraction for electrons than I, so Cl₂ more readily accepts electrons to form Cl⁻.
- Cl₂ acts as the oxidising agent (and is itself reduced to Cl⁻).
- I⁻ is oxidised to I₂ because the species with the more negative (less positive) E° half-reaction is reversed and acts as the reducing agent; the overall cell EMF is positive (1.36 − 0.54 = +0.82 V), confirming the reaction is spontaneous.
Key terms in this question
standard electrode potential · oxidising agent
Related
- All IB DP Chemistry Higher Level (2023 syllabus) revision notes →
- How to answer a "Explain" question →
- Decode the mark scheme abbreviations →
More Electron transfer reactions questions
- Explain why the standard cell potential, E°cell, of a galvanic cell decreases to…
- Explain why magnesium is a more effective reducing agent than iron, using standa…
- Explain why the standard electrode potential (E°) for the Fe³⁺/Fe²⁺ half-cell ca…
- Explain why a galvanic cell constructed from a zinc half-cell connected to a cop…