A sports drink manufacturer claims that the orange colouring used in their drink is a single pure substance. A student carries out paper chromatography on the orange colouring using two different solvents. In solvent A, the orange colouring produces three separate spots. In solvent B, the orange colouring produces a single spot. Explain what the results in each solvent tell us about the orange colouring, and state what the student should conclude overall about the manufacturer's claim.
Written & reviewed by James Millett — Biology (Imperial College London), PGCE Science (University of Cambridge).
Model answer (5 marks)
In solvent A the orange colouring gives three separate spots. This shows that the sample contains more than one substance – a mixture – because each component moves a different distance depending on its solubility in the mobile phase and its affinity for the stationary phase.
In solvent B the colouring gives a single spot. A pure compound would give a single spot in any solvent, but a single spot in one solvent does not prove that the sample is pure, because a mixture could also co‑move.
Therefore the evidence from solvent A is decisive: the orange colouring is a mixture. The manufacturer's claim that it is a single pure substance is incorrect.
The Rf values of the three spots in solvent A could be used to identify the individual components if reference standards are available.
In solvent B the colouring gives a single spot. A pure compound would give a single spot in any solvent, but a single spot in one solvent does not prove that the sample is pure, because a mixture could also co‑move.
Therefore the evidence from solvent A is decisive: the orange colouring is a mixture. The manufacturer's claim that it is a single pure substance is incorrect.
The Rf values of the three spots in solvent A could be used to identify the individual components if reference standards are available.
Examiner tips
- Show the logic: three spots = mixture; one spot alone not enough; conclude mixture; mention Rf values for identification
Common mistakes
- Assuming the single spot in solvent B proves purity; ignoring that a mixture can co‑move; not explaining why different solubilities give different Rf values
Mark scheme (5 marks)
- The three spots in solvent A show that the orange colouring is a mixture (containing more than one substance/compound)
- The three substances travel different distances because they have different solubilities in the mobile phase (solvent A) / distribute differently between the mobile and stationary phases
- A pure compound produces a single spot in all solvents, so the single spot in solvent B alone does not prove purity
- The result from solvent A (three spots) is evidence that the colouring is a mixture, so the manufacturer's claim is incorrect / false
- The Rf values of the three spots (in solvent A) could be used to help identify the individual substances present in the mixture
Key terms in this question
pure substance · paper chromatography
Related
- All WJEC A-Level Chemistry (Wales) revision notes →
- How to answer a "Explain" question →
- Decode the mark scheme abbreviations →
More Electronic structure questions
- A forensic scientist is investigating an ink sample taken from a suspected forge…
- A manufacturer produces two versions of a paint: one described as a 'pure pigmen…
- A scientist is testing two painkiller tablets from different manufacturers. Both…
- A student carries out paper chromatography on a food colouring and obtains three…